Difference between revisions of "Institute for Progress and Development"

From Archiepyedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 16: Line 16:
 
{{#spoiler:show=Spoiler for A QUESTION OF TRUST|Indeed, not only has the whole Tulpencoin project been a scam from start to finish, but it has also provided an opportunity to steal cryptocurrency wallets from some of its more careless customers. Not only that, but the whole crypto venture has also turned out to be a useful way of laundering the profits from the Institute's drug-dealing program.}}
 
{{#spoiler:show=Spoiler for A QUESTION OF TRUST|Indeed, not only has the whole Tulpencoin project been a scam from start to finish, but it has also provided an opportunity to steal cryptocurrency wallets from some of its more careless customers. Not only that, but the whole crypto venture has also turned out to be a useful way of laundering the profits from the Institute's drug-dealing program.}}
  
{{#spoiler:show=Spoiler for BAD DAY IN MINSK|The Institute has also been involved with the [[Gretzky Gang|Belarusian mafia]] in an attempt to use mathematics to profit from chaotic movements in the local currency markets.}}
+
{{#spoiler:show=Spoiler for BAD DAY IN MINSK|The Institute has also been involved with the [[Gretzky Family|Belarusian mafia]] in an attempt to use mathematics to profit from chaotic movements in the local currency markets.}}
  
 
===Politics===
 
===Politics===
  
 
(more to come)
 
(more to come)

Revision as of 20:10, 23 June 2022

Institute for Progress and Development logo (© DALL•E)

The Institute for Progress and Development is a secretive think tank based in Trapp Street, London SW1.

Personnel

The Institute is controlled by a Board of Directors, none of whose names have been made public, although there have been several rumours to the effect that The Hon Sholto Chelford-Bickerton has at least a prominent position in the organisation. The following other individuals have close links to the Institute:

Funding

The Institute's sources of funding are exceptionally opaque. The seed capital for the project was supposedly provided by a shady group of American billionaires, but since then the Institute has made considerable efforts to be self-funding, for example by hiring out consultants to industry, commerce and government. There have also been suggestions that its close relationship with de Montfort's Tulpencoin organisation has been to the advantage of the Institute's coffers.

Politics

(more to come)